Moral subjectivism and the semantics of disagreements

Moral subjectivism and the semantics of disagreements

Blog Article

In this paper, I discuss which semantic theory moral subjectivists should adopt.Moral subjectivism is understood broadly to include all grand love red heart reposado tequila theories according to which moral sentences are truth-apt, at least sometimes true, and made true by the mental attitudes of certain relevant agent or set of agents.Due to the breadth of this definition, an initial concern is whether a unified semantic approach is able to accommodate all varieties of subjectivism.I argue that it is.I then proceed to analyse chicago cubs earrings the main semantic theories for moral sentences as they apply to the standard issue of moral disagreements.

I conclude in favour of so-called Non-Indexical Contextualism.